High-involvement management and workforce reduction: Competitive advantage or disadvantage?
Authors: Christopher D. Zatzick and Roderick D. Iverson
Overview
Abstract (English)
Although interest in the workplace trends of downsizing and high-involvement work practices continues to grow, research examining the intersection between them has been limited. In this study, we examine (1) how layoffs moderate the relationship between high-involvement work practices and productivity, and (2) how continued investments in these work practices throughout layoff periods maintain workforce productivity. Findings indicate a negative relationship between high-involvement work practices and productivity in workplaces with higher layoff rates. However, workplaces that continue investments in high-involvement work practices are able to avoid productivity losses, as compared to workplaces that discontinue such investments.
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Christopher D. Zatzick and Roderick D. Iverson |
Publication Year | 2006 |
Title | High-involvement management and workforce reduction: Competitive advantage or disadvantage? |
Volume | 49 |
Journal Name | The Academy of Management Journal |
Number | 5 |
Pages | 999-1015 |
Publication Language | English |
- Christopher D. Zatzick
- Christopher D. Zatzick and Roderick D. Iverson
- High-involvement management and workforce reduction: Competitive advantage or disadvantage?
- The Academy of Management Journal
- 49
- 2006
- 5
- 999-1015