Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project
Authors: Chris Riddell and W. Craig Riddell
Overview
Abstract (English)
The Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP) was a well-known welfare-to-work experiment that provided a generous but time-limited financial incentive to leave welfare and enter the workforce. Experimental evidence showed large short-term impacts but no lasting effects. We argue that these conclusions need to be reassessed. Policy changes implemented during the SSP implied that the control group’s behavior did not provide an appropriate counterfactual. We estimate the impacts the financial incentive would have had in an unchanging policy environment. This reassessment leads to significant changes in the lessons previously reached. Our study demonstrates that experimental findings need to be interpreted with care.
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Chris Riddell and W. Craig Riddell |
Publication Year | 2020 |
Title | Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project |
Volume | 38 |
Journal Name | Journal of Labor Economics |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 873-914 |
Publication Language | English |
- Chris Riddell
- Chris Riddell and W. Craig Riddell
- Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project
- Journal of Labor Economics
- 38
- 2020
- 4
- 873-914