Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project
Auteurs: Chris Riddell et W. Craig Riddell
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
The Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP) was a well-known welfare-to-work experiment that provided a generous but time-limited financial incentive to leave welfare and enter the workforce. Experimental evidence showed large short-term impacts but no lasting effects. We argue that these conclusions need to be reassessed. Policy changes implemented during the SSP implied that the control group’s behavior did not provide an appropriate counterfactual. We estimate the impacts the financial incentive would have had in an unchanging policy environment. This reassessment leads to significant changes in the lessons previously reached. Our study demonstrates that experimental findings need to be interpreted with care.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Chris Riddell et W. Craig Riddell |
Année de pulication | 2020 |
Titre | Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project |
Volume | 38 |
Nom du Journal | Journal of Labor Economics |
Numéro | 4 |
Pages | 873-914 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Chris Riddell
- Chris Riddell et W. Craig Riddell
- Interpreting experimental evidence in the presence of post-randomization events: A re-assessment of the Self-Sufficiency Project
- Journal of Labor Economics
- 38
- 2020
- 4
- 873-914