Comparing health status and access to healthcare in Canada’s largest metropolitan areas
Authors: Daniel Harrington, Mark Rosenberg, and Kathi Wilson
Overview
Abstract (English)
Research has shown persistent inequalities in access to health care between and within sociodemographic groups and geographic areas. Yet much of what we know about geographical disparities in access comes from studies of regional and urban/rural contrasts, or from studies of intra-urban, neighborhood-level variations. We know relatively little about variations in access to primary health care across different urban areas, and whether such variations translate into differences among residents’ health. This study examines how health status and access to primary care vary across five of Canada’s largest cities, paying particular attention to populations that may be particularly vulnerable based on age and income. Across all outcomes, there was a consistently strong relationship with individual socioeconomic status. We show that city of residence is important for access to health care but not for health status. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance for urban health-care policy and delivery, and impacts on health and access to care.
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Harrington, Mark Rosenberg, and Kathi Wilson |
Publication Year | 2014 |
Title | Comparing health status and access to healthcare in Canada’s largest metropolitan areas |
Volume | 35 |
Journal Name | Urban Geography |
Number | 8 |
Pages | 1156-1170 |
Publication Language | English |
- Daniel Harrington
- Daniel Harrington, Mark Rosenberg, and Kathi Wilson
- Comparing health status and access to healthcare in Canada’s largest metropolitan areas
- Urban Geography
- 35
- 2014
- 8
- 1156-1170