An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press)
Authors: Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, and Peter M. Smith
Overview
Abstract (English)
This study explores whether instruments used to measure Job Control and Psychological Job Demands function differently by sex. We evaluated the comparability of these measures by sex using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. All estimates were invariant by sex, except for the intercept for the item assessing how “hectic” a worker perceives his/her job (which contributes to the Demands measure). This item intercept was statistically significantly higher for women than men, but not practically so. These findings suggest that the differences observed between men and women in the impact of work stress on health cannot be explained by measurement bias (when using the work stress measures employed in this study). Further research is needed to understand why work stress appears to affect the health of men and women differently.
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, and Peter M. Smith |
Publication Year | 2017 |
Title | An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press) |
Volume | 13 |
Journal Name | Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 37-48 |
Publication Language | English |
- Amber Bielecky
- Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, and Peter M. Smith
- An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press)
- Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis
- 13
- 2017
- 2
- 37-48