An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press)
Auteurs: Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, et Peter M. Smith
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
This study explores whether instruments used to measure Job Control and Psychological Job Demands function differently by sex. We evaluated the comparability of these measures by sex using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. All estimates were invariant by sex, except for the intercept for the item assessing how “hectic” a worker perceives his/her job (which contributes to the Demands measure). This item intercept was statistically significantly higher for women than men, but not practically so. These findings suggest that the differences observed between men and women in the impact of work stress on health cannot be explained by measurement bias (when using the work stress measures employed in this study). Further research is needed to understand why work stress appears to affect the health of men and women differently.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, et Peter M. Smith |
Année de pulication | 2017 |
Titre | An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press) |
Volume | 13 |
Nom du Journal | Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis |
Numéro | 2 |
Pages | 37-48 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Amber Bielecky
- Amber Bielecky, Selahadin Ibrahim, Cameron A. Mustard, Chantal Brisson, et Peter M. Smith
- An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: Are we comparing apples to apples? (in press)
- Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis
- 13
- 2017
- 2
- 37-48