Disparities in academic achievement: Assessing the role of habitus and practice
Authors: Jason D. Edgerton, Lance W. Roberts, and Tracey Peter
Overview
Abstract (English)
Bourdieu’s theory of cultural and social reproduction-with its core concepts cultural capital, habitus, practice and field-is a leading account of the intergenerational persistence of educational inequality. Although numerous studies examine the relationship between class, cultural capital and academic outcomes, and some focus on gender differences in cultural capital, few attempt to operationalize Bourdieu’s accompanying concepts of habitus and practice, and to consider gender differences along these dimensions. The present study addresses these gaps by examining a “structure-disposition-practice” model of the relationships between family socioeconomic status (SES), sex, habitus, academic practices, and academic achievement using multilevel Canadian data. findings of SES and gender differences in the model offer qualified support for the potential of Bourdieu’s framework to help increase our understanding of class and gender disparities in educational outcomes. Results suggest that habitus, practice and the “structure-disposition-practice” model are not only theoretically sophisticated, but also empirically sustainable and that future efforts to more precisely measure the model’s concepts and relationships are warranted
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Jason D. Edgerton, Lance W. Roberts, and Tracey Peter |
Publication Year | 2013 |
Title | Disparities in academic achievement: Assessing the role of habitus and practice |
Volume | 114 |
Journal Name | Social Indicators Research |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 303-322 |
Publication Language | English |
- Jason D. Edgerton
- Jason D. Edgerton, Lance W. Roberts, and Tracey Peter
- Disparities in academic achievement: Assessing the role of habitus and practice
- Social Indicators Research
- 114
- 2013
- 2
- 303-322