Baby bonus, anyone? Examining heterogeneous responses to a pro-natalist policy
Authors: Natalie Malak, Md Mahbubur Rahman, and Terry A. Yip
Overview
Abstract (English)
We examine the impact of the Allowance for Newborn Children, a universal baby bonus offered by the Canadian province of Quebec, on birth order, sibship sex composition, income, and education. We find a large response for third- and higher-order births for which the bonus was more generous. Interestingly, though, we find stronger response if there were two previous sons or a previous son and daughter rather than two previous daughters. We also find, in addition to a transitory effect, a permanent effect, with the greatest increase in one daughter-two son families among three-child households. Moreover, we find a hump shape response by income group, with the greatest response from middle-income families. Also, women with at least some post-secondary education respond more to the policy than those with less. These findings suggest that properly structured pro-natal policies can successfully increase fertility among different segments of the population while simultaneously diminishing the effect of gender preferences and fertility disparity related to women’s education.
Abstract (French)
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Details
Type | Journal article |
---|---|
Author | Natalie Malak, Md Mahbubur Rahman, and Terry A. Yip |
Publication Year | 2019 |
Title | Baby bonus, anyone? Examining heterogeneous responses to a pro-natalist policy |
Volume | 32 |
Journal Name | Journal of Population Economics |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 1205-1246 |
Publication Language | English |
- Natalie Malak
- Natalie Malak, Md Mahbubur Rahman, and Terry A. Yip
- Baby bonus, anyone? Examining heterogeneous responses to a pro-natalist policy
- Journal of Population Economics
- 32
- 2019
- 4
- 1205-1246