Are Unions good or bad for organizations? The moderating role of management’s response
Auteurs: Dionne Pohler et Andrew Luchak
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
Union impact research has been hindered by an underdeveloped conceptualization of management response, contributing to inconclusive empirical findings. Integrating the collective voice/institutional response model with the appropriateness framework, we propose that an employee-focused business strategy is a critical moderating variable in the relationship between union density and organizational outcomes that mitigates the negative effects of unions and enhances the positive effects by sending a clear signal of management’s intentions to co-operate. Using a panel dataset of Canadian organizations over six years, we provide empirical evidence to support our arguments. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Dionne Pohler et Andrew Luchak |
Année de pulication | 2015 |
Titre | Are Unions good or bad for organizations? The moderating role of management’s response |
Volume | 53 |
Nom du Journal | British Journal of Industrial Relations |
Numéro | 3 |
Pages | 423-459 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Dionne Pohler
- Dionne Pohler et Andrew Luchak
- Are Unions good or bad for organizations? The moderating role of management’s response
- British Journal of Industrial Relations
- 53
- 2015
- 3
- 423-459