Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments
Auteurs: Riddell, Chris et Riddell, W. Craig
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
The Income Maintenance Experiments have received renewed attention due to growing international interest in a Basic Income. Proponents viewed a Negative Income Tax as a replacement for traditional welfare with stronger work incentives and reduced poverty. However, existing labor supply estimates for single parents are uniformly negative. We reassess the experimental evidence and find randomization failure in two NITs (Gary and Seattle). In Denver and Manitoba, we find a positive labor supply response for those on welfare prior to random assignment. Our results provide strong evidence that a NIT can increase work activity among single parents on welfare.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Riddell, Chris et Riddell, W. Craig |
Année de pulication | 2022 |
Titre | Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments |
Nom du Journal | Journal of Labor Economics |
Pages | 723706 |
DOI | 10.1086/723706 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Riddell, Chris
- Riddell, Chris et Riddell, W. Craig
- Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments
- Journal of Labor Economics
- 2022
- 723706
- 10.1086/723706