Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation
Authors: Benoît Laplante and Ana Laura Fostik
BACKGROUND The diffusion of cohabitation and, presumably, of childbearing within cohabitation, inspires interest in measuring the respective contribution of childbearing within marriage and within cohabitation to overall fertility. However, there is no consensus on a proper way to do so. OBJECTIVE Contribute to the development of tools for assessing the relative importance of marriage and cohabitation to overall fertility by developing period measures closely related to age specific fertility rates and the total fertility rate. METHODS We introduce two measures: 1) the contribution of the conjugal state (living alone, living in a cohabiting union, being married) to age-specific fertility rates (CASFR) and 2) the contribution of the conjugal state to the TFR (CTFR). These measures are similar in construction to the marital (legitimate) fertility rates and marital (legitimate) TFR, but they are weighted by the proportion of women living alone, cohabiting, or being married at each age, so that their sum is the overall TFR. Taken together, they represent the fertility of the average woman of a synthetic cohort who moves across the various conjugal states (living alone, cohabiting, being married) over her life course. They provide “realistic” estimates of completed fertility within each conjugal state. CONCLUSION CASFRs provide a description of the fertility, over her life course, of a synthetic woman who would have spent her reproductive years living alone, cohabiting, and being married as the average woman of the synthetic cohort. CTFR provides a decomposition of the cumulative fertility of this synthetic woman. Over her life course, she would have had exactly the number of children computed using the overall TFR, but CTFR details the proportion of these children she would have had while living alone, while cohabiting, and while being married. COMMENTS Despite being defined as a conditional ASR weighted by the age-specific proportion of women living alone, cohabiting, or being married, computing the CASFR does not require that one know the population distribution of women by conjugal status, as this quantity cancels out. As a consequence, CASFR and CTFR may be computed without this information, as the parity-specific ASFR may be computed without knowing the population distribution of women by parity.
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
David Pelletier (2016).
The diffusion of cohabitation and children's risks of family dissolution in Canada
Demographic Research , 1317-1342
Céline Le Bourdais, Sung-Hee Jeon, Shelley Clark, and Évelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk (2016).
Impact of conjugal separation on women's income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Demographic Research , 1489-1522
Ravi Pendakur and Nathan Young (2013).
Putting on the moves: Individual, household and community level determinants of long-distance moving in Canada
Demographic Research , 767-796
Mariona Lozano, Dana Hamplová, and Céline Le Bourdais (2016).
Non-standard work schedules, gender, and parental stress
Demographic Research , 259-284
Frank T. Denton and Byron G. Spencer (2011).
A dynamic extension of the period life tables
Demographic Research , 831-854
Benoît Laplante (2016).
A matter of norms: Family background, religion, and generational change in the diffusion of first union breakdown among French-speaking Quebeckers
Demographic Research , 783-812
Samuel Vézina and Alain Bélanger (2019).
Impacts of education and immigration on the size and skills of the future workforce
Demographic Research , 331-366