Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws
Auteurs: Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
While less-educated women are more likely to give birth as teenagers, there is scant evidence the relationship is causal. We investigate this possibility using variation in compulsory schooling laws (CSLs) to identify the impact of formal education on teen fertility for a large sample of women drawn from multiple waves of the Canadian Census. We find that greater CSL-induced schooling reduces the probability of giving birth as a teenager by roughly two to three percentage points. We find evidence that education affects the timing of births in a way that strongly implies an “incarceration” effect of education. In particular, we find large negative impacts of education on births to young women aged seventeen and eighteen, but little evidence of an effect after these ages, consistent with the idea that being enrolled in school deters fertility in a contemporaneous manner. Our findings are robust to the inclusion of several province-level characteristics including multiple dimensions of school quality, expenditures on public programs and region-specific time trends.
Détails
Type | Document de travail (en ligne) |
---|---|
Auteur | Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky |
Année de pulication | 2015 |
Titre | Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws |
Série | NBER Working Paper |
Numéro | 21594 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Philip DeCicca
- Document de travail (en ligne)
- Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws
- Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky
- NBER Working Paper
- 2015
- 21594