Agreement between individual and neighborhood income measures in patients with colorectal cancer in Canada
Authors: Davis, Laura E, Mahar, Alyson L, and Strumpf, Erin C
With increasing interest in income-related differences in cancer outcomes, accurate measurement of income is imperative. Misclassification of income can result in wrong conclusions as to the presence of income inequalities. We determined misclassification between individual- and neighborhood-level income and their association with overall survival among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.The Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts were used to identify CRC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2017. We used neighborhood income quintiles from Statistics Canada and created individual income quintiles from the same data sources to be as similar as possible. Agreement between individual and neighborhood income quintiles was measured using cross-tabulations and weighted kappa statistics. Cox proportional hazards and Lin semiparametric hazards models were used to determine the effects of individual and neighborhood income independently and jointly on survival. Analyses were also stratified by rural residence.A total of 103?530 CRC patients were included in the cohort. There was poor agreement between individual and neighborhood income with only 17% of respondents assigned to the same quintile (weighted kappa?=?0.18). Individual income had a greater effect on relative and additive survival than neighborhood income when modeled separately. The interaction between individual and neighborhood income demonstrated that the most at risk for poor survival were those in the lowest individual and neighborhood income quintiles. Misclassification was more likely to occur for patients residing in rural areas.Cancer researchers should avoid using neighborhood income as a proxy for individual income, especially among patients with cancers with demonstrated inequalities by income.
Please note that abstracts only appear in the language of the publication and might not have a translation.
Linda Kachuri, M. Anne Harris, Jill S. MacLeod, Michael Tjepkema, Paul A. Peters, and Paul A. Demers (2017).
Cancer risks in a population-based study of 70,570 agricultural workers: Results from the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC)
BMC Cancer , 15-Jan
Kai-Erh Kao, Amanda C. Jones, Arto Ohinmaa, and Mike Paulden (2020).
The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada
Economics and Human Biology , 1-14
Dan L. Crouse, Paul A. Peters, Perry Hystad, Jeffrey R. Brook, Aaron van Donkelaar, Randall V. Martin, Paul J. Villeneuve, Michael Jerrett, Mark S. Goldberg, C. Arden Pope III, Michael Brauer, Robert D. Brook, Alain Robichaud, Richard Menard, and Richard T. Burnett (2015).
Ambient PM2.5, O3, and NO2 exposures and associations with mortality over 16 years of follow-up in the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC)
Environment International , 1180-1186
Dan L. Crouse, Lauren Pinault, Adele Balram, Michael Brauer, Richard T. Burnett, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Paul J. Villeneuve, and Scott Weichenthal (2019).
Complex relationships between greenness, air pollution, and mortality in a population-based Canadian cohort
Environment International , 292-300
Dan L. Crouse (2018).
Living in urban Canada: Do nearby green spaces make a difference to your health?
Smriti Singh, James Ted McDonald, Gabriela Ilie, and Anil Adisesh (2020).
An examination of the association between lifetime history of prostate and pancreatic cancer diagnosis and occupation in a population sample of Canadians
PLOS One , 17-Jan