Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws
Auteurs: Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
While less-educated women are more likely to give birth as teenagers, there is scant evidence the relationship is causal. We investigate this possibility using variation in compulsory schooling laws (CSLs) to identify the impact of formal education on teen fertility at specific ages for a large sample of women drawn from multiple waves of the Canadian Census. We find large negative impacts of education on births for young women aged seventeen and eighteen, but less systematic evidence of an effect after these ages. While our findings are consistent with an “incarceration effect”, where school enrollment deters fertility in a contemporaneous manner, we cannot rule out longer-run effects of education on fertility.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky |
Année de pulication | 2020 |
Titre | Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws |
Volume | 69 |
Nom du Journal | Journal of Health Economics |
Numéro | January |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Philip DeCicca
- Philip DeCicca et Harry Krashinsky
- Does education reduce teen fertility? Evidence from compulsory schooling laws
- Journal of Health Economics
- 69
- 2020
- January