Is the cohabitation-marriage gap in money pooling universal?
Auteurs: Dana Hamplová, Céline Le Bourdais, et Évelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk
Aperçu
Résumé (français)
Veuillez noter que les résumés n'apparaissent que dans la langue de la publication et peuvent ne pas avoir de traduction.
Résumé (anglais)
Numerous studies have shown that cohabitors are less likely to pool their money than married couples. The authors raise the question of whether the marriage-cohabitation gap in money pooling varies according to the level of institutionalization of cohabitation in the society. They compared 2 Canadian regions with very different demographic regimes. The francophone province Québec has the highest proportion of cohabiting couples in the world, whereas the levels of cohabitation are moderate in other Canadian provinces. Moreover, the 2 regions differ in their legal systems (civil code vs. common law) and legal regulation of cohabitation. Using data from the Canadian 2011 General Social Survey (N=9,852), the authors found that cohabitors in both regions are less likely to pool their money together. Nevertheless, they did not confirm the hypothesis that the marriage-cohabitation gap is smaller in Québec despite the higher levels of institutionalization of cohabitation in this region.
Détails
Type | Article de journal |
---|---|
Auteur | Dana Hamplová, Céline Le Bourdais, et Évelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk |
Année de pulication | 2014 |
Titre | Is the cohabitation-marriage gap in money pooling universal? |
Volume | 76 |
Nom du Journal | Journal of Marriage and Family |
Numéro | 5 |
Pages | 983-997 |
Langue de publication | Anglais |
- Dana Hamplová
- Dana Hamplová, Céline Le Bourdais, et Évelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk
- Is the cohabitation-marriage gap in money pooling universal?
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- 76
- 2014
- 5
- 983-997